Archive for the ‘child sexual abuse’ Category
False Allegations
Posted by Anna on August 4, 2007
Posted in UK, child sexual abuse, false allegations, other blogs | Leave a Comment »
Repeat: sex is a consensual act
Posted by Anna on August 2, 2007
Posted in Aotearoa New Zealand, NZ Herald, child sexual abuse, headlines, sex | Leave a Comment »
Untold stories
Posted by Anna on July 28, 2007
Accused teacher says life shattered
Now I know there will be issues with what the media can report, but even so there is a huge disparity in this article between the teacher’s viewpoint and that of the girl. We hear all about his “supporters” and how this has shattered his life and his (rather short sighted) assertion that this is “anyone’s worst nightmare”.
So what about her. How has this affected her life. Can she sleep at night? Does she have nightmares? Is she still at school or is she too afraid? Is she ostracised there? Is she able to concentrate? Are her parents supporting her? Is she being blamed for what happened to her? How does she feel being accused of lying?
Because these are the stories that so often go untold.
Posted in Aotearoa New Zealand, allegedly, child sexual abuse, courts, stuff.co.nz, voices of survivors | Leave a Comment »
This headline says it all
Posted by Anna on July 19, 2007
‘Court hears details of alleged sexual assault of murdered girl’
In other words, they accept the murder happened but not the sexual assault. I wrote about this type of discrepancy here.
Posted in Aotearoa New Zealand, NZ Herald, allegedly, child sexual abuse, headlines | Leave a Comment »
Allegedly again
Posted by Anna on July 17, 2007
Unfortunately this article doesn’t seem to be following the lead of this one. Every mention of abuse is preceded by “allegedly” or words to that effect.
I’ve outlined the problems with this here, but I think it’s worth noting other examples.
Posted in Aotearoa New Zealand, NZ Herald, allegedly, child sexual abuse | Leave a Comment »
A positive example
Posted by Anna on July 16, 2007
Here’s a positive example of how newspapers can – and should – not question the veracity of what happened to the person who was sexually assaulted, but at the same time not assume the guilt of the perpetrator.
If only more journalists did the same.
A 54-year-old car salesman is to appear in court today on charges relating to the abduction and sexual assault of a 13-year-old girl in West Auckland two weeks ago.
So the article assumes the events have happened, but states that the man has been charged with them, not that he did them.
The girl was walking along West Coast Rd in Glen Eden on her way to visit a friend when she was lured into a car.
She was sexually and physically abused during her 45-minute ordeal in West Auckland.
So there is no use of the word allegedly here, that these events happened is not questioned.
The man had allegedly asked the teenager for directions, then insisted she get into his car to show him the way.
Here the word allegedly is used, and whilst it’s not the ideal phrasing it is only done here because it is describing his involvement in what happened, rather than just what happened.
The man will appear in the Rotorua District Court to face charges of abduction, sexual violation, and assault with intent to commit sexual violation of a girl aged between 12 and 16 years.
A straightforward statement of fact, with no judgement implied on either his guilt or her truthfulness/reliability.
Posted in Aotearoa New Zealand, NZ Herald, allegedly, child sexual abuse, courts, positive example | Leave a Comment »
Sex vs Rape again
Posted by Anna on July 4, 2007
Salvation Army makes more payouts to sex victims
One more time (or two, or ten, or a million).
Sex is a consensual act between two individuals of an appropriate age to give true consent. Whilst it may be regretted, it is not something that has victims. This is not sex – it is rape and abuse.
Posted in NZ Herald, child sexual abuse, headlines, institutional abuse, sex | Leave a Comment »